PRIVATE: week-end :-)

[click to enlarge]
[click to enlarge]
[click to enlarge]
[click to enlarge]
[click to enlarge]

[...] "Longhorn is financially important to Microsoft and the growth of the industry, but it's also important to maintain Microsoft's position as an innovative company. The consensus is that Apple has lapped Microsoft many times on innovation."
Why be innovative? Werbach says that, in the short run, being innovative doesn't matter much. Over several years, however, a failure to innovate translates into a brain drain. The best and brightest programmers and developers want to work for the most innovative companies like Google. If Microsoft isn't viewed as innovative it loses out on talent, which may focus on rival products such as Linux.
"Psychologically, Longhorn is very important," says Werbach. "If it succeeds, Microsoft continues to grow and attract the best talent. If Longhorn only maintains Microsoft's past glory, it may affect the company over the next five years."




Well it's all happening on the glowria.fr/live blog ! We're covering the Cannes Film Festival with a team of 10 people, blogging live anecdotes, backstage events, parties, breakfasts, film screenings, etc!
We're even doing a street marketing event where we're handing 30,000 flyers to all on-lookers with the help of 3 absolutely lovely hostesses. What for ? Hey, we're allowing anyone to post a picture to photo@glowria.fr, or send an MMS or an SMS and be published immediately on our blog.
- The enterprise software business model is dead. This is refrain many VCs are mumbling to each other lately. Price pressure is incredibly intense between open source, Microsoft moving up the stack, vendor consolidation, IT buying wariness, the ASP model, overfunding in interesting sectors and many other factors. It used to be that you could build a profitable enterprise software company at the $15-20M threshold. But with today's pricing pressures and high cost of sale, it seems to have jumped to $40M, and it's harder to reach that threshold quickly. VC appetite for standard enterprise software appears to be dwindling to nothing.
- LAMP cost of ownership vs. Microsoft is a myth. This is a new acronymn that I learned today. It stands for Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP - all open source components that are eating away at Microsoft's value chain. Microsoft firmly believes that they are right on the facts and losing a perception battle with their core developer community - and need to fix this, fast.
- Microsoft is no longer the Big Bad Wolf. Believe it or not, Microsoft feels downright warm and fuzzy lately to a VC. It used to be that VCs would complain that investing is software is dumb because Microsoft will simply build it and give it away for free. Nowadays, you hear much less of that. The law of large numbers has settled into Redmond's decisions. If a business is less than $1 billion in platform revenue potential, it's not interesting enough to warrant Microsoft's attention. Therefore, there are plenty of multi-hundred million dollar software segments that Microsoft is thrilled to help young companies build (on top of their platform, of course). Also, Microsoft's IP strategy is now all about aggressive cross-licensing rather than offensive litigation. This company has really grown up over the years.
Microsoft major core bets are: software development platforms, information navigation & integration, communications, entertainment, security. Ballmer also commented on the critical nature of patents, and how Microsoft was often spending more money on buying or creating patents than developing the actual technology. And they will spend $6B in R&D this year. A few areas of growth perceived by Microsoft:
- Windows: Software Assurance, Premium functionality, Music, Security
- Information Worker: Realtime Communication, Business Information, License acceleration (read: go after pirated versions of Office), Vertical applications (project management, note taking,...)
- Server: Premium CAL, Management tools, Mid-market functionality
- MBS: Platform for small verticals, Enterprise presence with a large number of vertical solutions
- Home Entertainment: Xenon - XBox 3, TV platform
- MSN: Search, Content, Mail/Instant Messaging, Storage
My final word: building a business is a very old idea. It has one simple rule: you must sell what you buy with a profit. The question we must all answer next is: how big a profit?


In the absence of an offering from Sun, the Apache Foundation will begin a project to create open source Java for desktop computers called "Project Harmony." Citing broad community interest, the project will create a version of the Java 2, Standard Edition (J2SE) runtime platform that is compatible with Sun's Java.
The project is possible because Sun changed the licensing rules for J2SE 5.0 and liberalized the Java Community Process.
Project leads stressed that the project is not poised to compete with Sun, which has opposed efforts to open source Java due to legal considerations. Project Harmony will be compatible with Sun's standard specifications and compatibility will be ensured by licensing and testing with Sun's TCK, which is available free of cost to non-profits.
Apache's efforts will be monitored by a code auditing process that will make certain that legal problems do not occur. Developers from Kaffe and Classpath, makers of open source virtual machines, will contribute to Harmony.
Commenting on the project, Graham Hamilton, a Sun vice president, wrote in his Web blog, that "Apache have always been a strong supporter of the Java compatibility program and I'm glad to see that they are emphasizing that commitment to compatibility as part of the Harmony project. Compatibility is one of the bedrock values of the Java community."
"The licensing rules for J2SE 5.0 were carefully designed to allow independent, compatible open-source implementations of the J2SE specification," added Hamilton. "Personally, I am not entirely sure if the world really needs a second J2SE implementation, but at the same time I am also glad to see that all the effort we put into getting the rules and the licensing issues straightened out is actually proving useful!"
Sun has said that it will participate in the project in some way. The Apache Foundation welcomes the involvement of any interested parties and has encouraged dialog within the Java community.
A country’s e-readiness is essentially a measure of its e-business environment, a collection of factors that indicate how amenable a market is to Internet-based opportunities.
[...] The e-readiness rankings are a weighted collection of nearly 100 quantitative and qualitative criteria, organised into six distinct categories measuring the various components of a country’s social, political, economic and of course technological development.
[...] E-readiness is not simply a matter of the number of computer servers, websites and mobile phones in the country (although these naturally form a core component of the rankings), but also such things as its citizens' ability to utilise technology skillfully, the transparency of its business and legal systems, and the extent to which governments encourage the use of digital technologies.
IBM has scared customers by making too much noise about unproven technology. And though they are now trying to paint Notes as a part of Workplace, it may be too late. I know that IBM can come up with numbers of how successful they are doing but I am unphased. BPs I talk to are not seeing interest in Workplace in the SMB space. The enterprise sources I have do not paint a different picture. Smaller ISVs are asking whether it makes sense to release a WP product as there is no customer demand.
Synop finally released a new major release (v2.0) of its free feed reader, called SauceReader. The last version 1.9 was launched in October 2004 (cf. my post here).Sauce Reader 2.0 is a complete rewrite and no longer requires the .NET framework. Using .NET for Sauce Reader v1 we were never able to achieve the level of performance we considered appropriate for a heavily used productivity application. .NET is a compelling and powerful platform, but currently unsuitable for widely adopted client side applications.








